Or, to simplify the question, are people able to work without having someone to supervise them? It is very difficult to answer such a question.
Everybody turns to wikipedia someday. But, how many really write something in Wikipedia? Judging from myself, although I have been using it for a couple -or more- years, only a month ago I actually contributed by editing a minor detail about a Ferrari (that I don’t even remember right now). And that was the only time I ever contributed to such a well known open project.
Yes, I take part to some other kind-of open projects but I am not 100% devoted as I would have been in one of my personal projects. If it was just me, then I would believe that the problem is mine. But, as it seems, some of those community projects are not so active. Although the idea is pretty great, nobody cares enough to develop it. But, why is that?
I guess because in the community projects a very small amount of people really want -or have the free time- to participate and help it develop.
However, the exactly same project, if it was a personal, or team, project, it would have already reached the public. People are doing what they are said to do and, let’s be honest, if there is no one forcing you to do something (and by forcing I mean “motivating”) chances are that you are going to give it up for something more interesting.
My point of view? Simple.. As long as there are millions of users, a community project will be a huge success (Linux, wikipedia, etc).. Otherwise, there is better to be a “boss” in the small community. A leading-personality is more than necessary for the other group members to work efficiently..
